National Committee on Vital & Health Statistics (HCVHS)

Work Group on Computer-based Patient Records

AHCPR Conference Center
Rockvillle, MD, May 17-18, 1999

Written testimony
for

Home Health Care Classification System (HHCC)

Presentation By
Virginia K. Saba, EdD, RN, FAAN, FACMI
Distinguished Scholar / Developer
Georgetown University
Washington, DC

Home Health Care Classification System (HHCC)

Statement

As the developer of the Home Health Classification System (HHCC), I appreciate this opportunity to submit written comments and testify to the National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS) -- Work Group on Computer-based Patient Records. The HHCC System can be used to assist and advise the Secretary of Health and Human Services in “ the adoption of a uniform data standards for patient medical record information and the electronic exchange of such information” for the implementation of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996.

To-date, the information presented to the NCVHS and reported in the literature clearly indicate that “PATIENT CARE DATA” represent the largest gap in the existing health care databases. Further, the federally approved terminologies used to record medical information are primarily designed to code disease conditions and/or procedures. These terminologies do not address the CARE of patients, regardless of setting; and as a result, CARE data are not generally collected by CPR systems. However, to support future PMRI requirements, the CPR Systems must include patient CARE data to determine costs, assess quality, and evaluate outcomes.

At this time, the Home Health Care Classification (HHCC) System is available and can be used to document and code patient CARE data primarily for the home health industry. It consists of two interrelated terminologies -- HHCC of Nursing Diagnoses and HHCC of Nursing Interventions -- classified by twenty care components (20 CCs) that represent the Physiological, Psychological, Functional, and Health Behaviors Patterns of patient CARE. (See Appendix A). The 20 CCs also serve as a uniform framework for mapping the two interrelated HHCC terminologies to each other and to other medical terminologies (Saba, 1995; Saba & Sparks, 1998).

The major reasons why the HHCC System differ from the other American Nurses Association (ANA) ?Recognized’ nursing terminologies and should be considered for implementation for the HIPAA legislation are listed below.

The two HHCC Terminologies of Nursing Diagnoses and Nursing Interventions:

  1. Use a framework of 20 Care components that focus on the holistic approach to patient care.
  2. Structured similar to ICD-10 making it possible to diagnoses to interventions, to ICD terminologies, and to other terminologies.
  3. Designed as discrete atomic-level data elements using modifiers to expand and enhance the data elements.
  4. Coded for computer processing making it possible for the data to be combined, aggregated, summarized, and analyzed.
  5. Facilitate the electronic documentation od patient care at the point-of-care.
  6. Available because it is in the public domain.

Thus, The HHCC System with the two interrelated terminologies, can be used to code, index, classify; as well as, document, track, and measure home health patient CARE over time for the episode of illness and/or wellness. That includes:

  1. Assessing the patient CARE needs on admission;
  2. Tracking CARE -- DURING and BETWEEN -- home health visits; and
  3. Evaluating CARE Outcomes on Discharge.

Thus, CARE provided over time can not only be cost effective, but also can address quality and evaluate outcomes.

As the NCVHS -- Work Group on Computer-based Patient Records consider medical and clinical specific code set issues surrounding implementing the HIPAA requirements, I am providing the following responses to specific questions posed by the Committee.

ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS

1. DEFINITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR PATIENT MEDICAL RECORD INFORMATION (PMRI): HOW WOULD DEFINE OR DESCRIBE PMRI?

The newest definition for the Patient Medical Record Information is the one defined by Dick and Steen (1991) in the Institute of Medicine (IOM) report on the Computer- based Patient Record (CPR) as: “The patient record is the repository of information about a single patient. The information is generated by health care professionals as a direct result of interaction with a patient or with individuals who have personal knowledge of the patient(or with both). Traditionally, patient records have been paper and have been used to store patient care data” (p.11). In 1996, Chute and colleagues further stated in their writings that “patient conditions and events are the core of patient record content” (p.224).

However, the above PMRI definitions have to be expanded to address the electronic exchange requirements for implementing HIPAA. The CPR is defined by Dick and Steen (1991) in the IOM report as: “an electronic patient record that resides in a system specifically designed to support users by providing accessibility to complete and accurate data, alerts, reminders, clinical decision support systems, links to medical knowledge, and other aids” (p.11). Where as, Chute and colleagues (1996) defined the CPR as those patient records which: “ .. will require standard vocabularies to represent these data consistently, thereby facilitating clinical decision support, research, and efficient care delivery” (p. 224).

These two definitions complement each other and both are needed to support the CPR requirements for implementing HIPAA.

A. Why is comparable PMRI required, what functions does it serve?

Comparable PMRI are critical and essential for any CPR to have continuity across the continuum of care. Comparable, reliable, and timely data are needed to describe the health status of the patient population for specific episodes of illness. However, to achieve comparability, two major problems with the PMRI found in the existing CPR need to be resolved. The first, is a need to code and collect patient CARE data for an episode of illness. And the second, is a need for a uniform framework to map medical diagnostic, therapeutic, and other health-related terminologies including a CARE terminology.

A patient CARE terminology is critical for any CPR to capture the complete CARE process. Also, a framework is needed so that the different health care professionals using different terminologies can communicate with each other over time within and across health care settings, geographic boundaries, and population groups. Uniform data standards for the CPR could ensure valid and reliable data, as well as reduce costs of data collection. Such a framework could be used to guide and support health policy formulation, program planning, management, as well as measure the outcomes of the CARE.

B. How comparable does the PMRI need to be for these purposes, i.e., how precise, how accurate? What are the consequences if the PMRI in not accurate?

The precision of the terminologies vary depending on the usage of the data. If patient CARE data is collected based on a uniform data standard framework, then the data could be used to identify resources, determine costs and payments, report statistics, and evaluate outcomes. Several research studies have indicate that 99% compliance is easily achieved with a framework for mapping terminologies and is sufficient for generating such required information. Further, since health care is an art as well as a science, than it is unrealistic to think that a CPR could or should achieve 100 percent precision.

2. THE ROLE OF THE HOME HEALTH CARE CLASSIFICATION (HHCC) CODE SET / TERMINOLOGY PLAYS IN REPRESENTING PMRI?

A. What is the intended purpose of the the HHCC terminology? What is it currently used for?

B. What is the clinical domain, scope, or healthcare setting addressed by the HHCC’s terminologies?

The Home Health Care Classification (HHCC) System can play a major role in representing PMRI in the CPR. It can be used specifically to document PMRI including patient CARE for the home health and community health settings.

The HHCC System consists of two separate but interrelated terminologies -- HHCC of Nursing Diagnoses and HHCC of Nursing Interventions -- which are both classified by 20 Care Components (CCs) that represent the Physiological, Psychological, Functional, and Health Behaviors patterns of clinical CARE. (See Appendix A). The 20 CCs also serve as a uniform data standard framework for mapping the terminologies to each other and to other medical and health related terminologies (Saba, 1994, 1997).

These two HHCC terminologies are designed not only to code, index, and classify; as well as, document, track, and measure home health CARE for a patient over time for an episode of illness. Specifically, they are used to: (a) Assess and diagnose patient CARE needs on admission; (b) Track CARE provided -- DURING and BETWEEN -- home health visits; and (c) Evaluate CARE Outcomes on Discharge for the episode of illness.

The HHCC of Nursing Diagnoses terminology consists of 145 (50 two digit major categories and 95 three digit subcategories) that depicts nursing diagnoses and/or patient problems. The HHCC of Nursing Interventions terminology consists of 160 (60 two digit major categories and 100 three digit subcategories) that depicts nursing interventions, procedures, activities and/or services.

The two terminologies also use modifiers to expand each code to represent a different level or axis for a patient problem and/or intervention. The HHCC of Nursing Diagnosis Terminology is expanded by using three modifiers (Improved, Stabilized, Deteriorated) to code the expected / actual outcomes in order to compare and evaluate them as outcomes of CARE. (This additional coded digit increased the number of the HHCC of Nursing Diagnoses terms from 145 to 435 terms [145 x 3]). The HHCC of Nursing Interventions Terminology is expanded by using four modifiers (Assess, Care, Teach, Manage) to code the type intervention action in order to identify the different types of action -- DURING and BETWEEN -- home health visits. It has been proven that types of intervention actions does impact on resources needed, cost of a visit, and quality of the CARE provided. (The additional coded digit increased the number of the HHCC of Nursing Interventions terms from 160 to total 640 [160 x 4]).

A. What evidence do you have of market acceptance of the HHCC terminology? (Ask users what their perceptions of gaps are)

The home health industry consists of approximately 10,000 Medicare certified home health agencies (HHAs) who are providers of home health services to Medicare recipients. Also, there are thousands of health-related facilities such as outpatient clinics, health maintenance organizations (HMOs) and other community health settings that may offer similar services who are not Medicare certified (NAHC, 1998).

To date, the two interrelated HHCC terminologies with the 20 CCs have been used by a large number of HHAs as well as by commercial developers of home health CPR systems to record and code patient CARE. They have been used separately or together to document and code patient CARE plans or protocols. Since the HHCC system is in the public domain and available on the Internet <http//:www.dml.georgetown.edu/research/hhcc>, it can be downloaded without permission. As a result, it is not possible to determine who and how many commercial vendors and/or HHAs are using the two HHCC terminologies with the 20 CCs separately or together.

Several HHAs and/or commercial vendors have indicated that they do use the two interrelated HHCC terminologies with the 20 CCs to map to the medical, disease, and/or clinical procedure terminologies required by the federal government. Others have indicated that they are using selected CCs or Nursing Interventions to document and cost out specific nursing services.

Also, evidence has been presented by several researchers who have conducted studies using the two interrelated HHCC terminologies with the 20 CCs, that the 20 CCs are 99% compliant with the other terminologies used by primary care providers who document and code medical conditions and/or procedures using other medical terminologies (Henry, Warren, Lange, & Button, 1998).

B. In what areas are you now planning to expand to other medical terminologies?

The next release of the HHCC System currently in progress is to expand the coding strategy to track patient CARE -- DURING and BETWEEN -- home health visits. The new innovative coding system is being tested on specific patient problems for an episode of illness. Documenting and Coding CARE -- DURING and BETWEEN -- home health visits has never been addressed by the HHAs and/or commercial vendors.. This coding strategy is envisioned to form the basis for a CPR that could be used to track patient CARE in order to identify resources, determine costs, and evaluate outcomes.

Another envisioned release is to expand the two interrelated HHCC Terminologies with the 20 CCs to encompass the scope of services provided by Primary Care Providers (PCPs) -- clinicians, physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners (NPs), and other advanced practice nurses (APNs). Since the PCPs function in the all health care settings -- home health, community, and ambulatory care -- we are studying the new services they provide to develop and expand the terminologies. Currently, the non-physician NP providers utilize only the coded terminologies used by physicians for reimbursement; and generally, omit and exclude patient CARE which does not have a reimbursable coded terminology.

3. HOW DOES the HHCC TERMINOLOGY RELATE TO OTHER MEDICAL TERMINOLOGIES?

The two interrelated HHCC terminologies -- Nursing Diagnoses and Nursing Interventions with the 20 CCs are related to other medical terminologies in several ways, eight of which, are described below:

A. ICD-10

The HHCC System is related to iCD-10 (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems) since the two interrelated HHCC terminologies -- Nursing Diagnoses and Nursing Intervention classified by the 20 CCs -- are coded similar to the ICD-10 five-character alphanumeric coding structure (WHO, 1990). By using the ICD-10 coding structure, the two HHCC terminologies can be mapped to medical diagnostic codes required by the federal regulators for the reimbursement of services provided to home health Medicare patients. The ICD-10 is being federally mandated to replace ICD-9 as the coding scheme for federal recipients of services by the year 2001.

The coding structure for either terminology consists of a first character -- an alphabetic code representing the ?Care Component’ followed by two numeric digits -- "major category" than a decimal point followed by a fourth numeric digit -- "subcategory" and a fifth digit -- "modifier".

B. HCFA HHA Form: 486

The HHCC System is also related the HCFA -486 - Home Health Medical Update Form which is the Form that must be completed by the nurse and/or therapist on admission to "prospectively" identify the nursing and other services that would be provided to the patient during the episode of illness. The Form which also includes a Medical Diagnosis and once approved by a Physician, allows the HHA providers to make home health visits that can be reimbursed payment by Medicare and/or third-party payers. However, the home health visits have to include only the visits for services from a "The List of 32 Treatment Codes for Professional Services Required for Skilled Nursing." The HCFA List of 32 Treatnent Codes are incorporated in the HHCC of Nursing Interventions Terminology and represent only a fraction of the 640 HHCC of Nursing Interventions found to represent the home health Industry (Saba & McCormick, 1996).

C. OASIS

The two HHCC terminologies with the 20 CCs complement the Outcome and ASessment Information Set (OASIS) data set (Shaughnessy, Crisler, & Schienker, 1997). The 79 OASIS quality indicators are being required by HCFA as the new Conditions of Participation for HHAs for services to Medicare recipients. OASIS is not a terminology but a set of indicators designed to comprehensively assess health status and care needs of patients in order to measure outcome-based quality improvement. Note that OASIS does not preclude the use of a terminology but rather it facilitates the need for the two interrelated HHCC terminologies to document and track home health patient CARE -- DURING and BETWEEN -- home health visits for an episode of illness.

D. NANDA Taxonomy I

The HHCC of Nursing Diagnosis does relate to the North American Nursing Diagnoses, NANDA Taxonomy I Revised (NANDA, 1991) which consisted of 104 NANDA approved Nursing Diagnoses and which were coded similar to ICD-10. The HHCC of Nursing Diagnoses have adapted and expanded Taxonomy I to include over 50 new home health diagnostic terms derived from the 40,000 statements collected by the Georgetown Home Care research study from which the HHCC of Nursing Diagnoses terminology was developed. The adapted NANDA terms were also restructured as noun phrases instead verb clauses making them unique and different from the NANDA labels.

E. Unified Medical Language System

The two HHCC terminologies with the 20 CCs have been included in the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) Metathesaurus database (NLM, 1999). In 1994, they were submitted to the NLM by the American Nurses Association as professionally ?recognized’ source vocabularies; and therefore, were eligible for inclusion into this massive national database. "The Metathesaurus is organized by concept or meaning. In essence, its purpose is to link alternative names and views of the same concept together and to identify useful relationships between different concepts" (p. 5) . Thus, the terms from the two HHCC terminologies including the 20 CCs are mapped to all other medical terminologies that represent similar concepts.

F. CINAHL Subject Heading List

The two HHCC terminologies with the 20 CC are also indexed in the Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health Literature’s CINAHL Subject Heading List (Cinahl Information Systems ( 1998). The CINAHL database is a bibliographic database which contains of abstracts and/or full text of nursing and related allied health literature in a machine-readable format and organized for retrieval and analysis. The two HHCC terminologies with the 20CCs are indexed as search terms to the nursing and allied health literature (CINAHL Database Thesaurus, 1998).

G. Foreign Translations

The two HHCC terminologies with the 20CCs have been integrated into several European terminologies as well as translated in several of the European languages -- Finnish, Dutch, and Portugese.

H. European Terminology Efforts

The two HHCC terminologies with the 20 CCs also have been integrated into at least two European terminology /vocabulary efforts. The first is the TELENURSE project being conducted by the Danish Institute for Health and Nursing Research, Copenhagen, Denmark. This project is focusing on developing a uniform standard CPR for nursing terminologies for the nursing organizations in the European Union member countries (Mortensen and colleagues (1994).

The second, is the International Classification of Nursing Practice (ICNP) under development by the International Council of Nurses (ICN) in Geneva, Switzerland (Mortensen & Nielsen 1996). Since 1998 the ICN has been collecting nursing terminologies and vocabularies from its members (national nursing organizations from Europe and around the world). The ICN research team are mapping and integrating the terminologies and/or vocabularies into a unique uniform ICNP . At this time, the ICNP is in its second generation and is still evolving. Once it is approved by all the 128 ICN member nations, then ICN plans submit it to the World Health Organization for consideration as a member of the ICD-10 family of disease and health-related classifications (WHO, 1990 p. 21). .

4. HOW DOES HHCC TERMINOLOGIES RELATE TO HEALTHCARE MESSAGE FORMAT STANDARDS?

A. Which message format standards reference or include the HHCC

Terminology?

The two HHCC terminologies with the 20 CCs have been approved as complying with at least three format standards. They comply with: (a) the Health Level 7 electronic transaction standards; (2) ICD-10 coding structure; and (c) the American Nurses Association (ANA) Information and Data Set Evaluation Center (NIDSEC) standards. NIDSEC was established “to develop and disseminate standards pertaining to information systems that support the documentation of nursing practice and to evaluate voluntarily submitted information systems against these standards” (NIDSEC, 1997, p.iv).

B. Is the use of your medical terminology within these message format standards required, preferred, or optional?

All of the format standards are optional since Nursing CARE is not required in any of the federally mandated terminologies. However, NIDSEC does recommend that any health-related CPR System include an approved ANA should include a nursing terminology such as the two HHCC terminologies with the 20 CCs.

5. ARE THERE ISSUES RELATED TO MEDICAL TERMINOLOGIES THAT DESERVE GOVERNMENT ATTENTION OR ACTION?

A. What are they?

YES! The federal government should consider expanding reimbursement for specific patient CARE in the home health and community health care settings. The current Medicare reimbursement policy for HHAs services for Medicare recipients is based on a medical diagnosis with related home visits prospectively determined and approved for 60 day certification time intervals. Reimbursement is NOT based on the assessment of a patient problem (nursing diagnosis) nor on the specific patient CARE (services) provided -- DURING and BETWEEN -- home health visits during an episode of illness. Thus, it is imperative that the federal government approve of a terminology to document and code patient care and approve of the reimbursement of patient CARE services. Such CARE data can ensure continuity across the continuum of health care.

Further, it is imperative that the federal government support measures to develop uniform data standard framework so that the existing health care terminologies and/or coding strategies can be mapped. Even though CPR systems have existed for over 30 years, we do not have any federally mandated data standards to implement the scope and intent of the PMRI .

B. What can be done to address these issues in a one-to four-year time frame?

The two HHCC terminologies with the 20 CCs were developed from the HCFA funded Georgetown University Home Care Project. They could be used to develop a CPR that can track patient CARE -- DURING and BETWEEN -- home health visits for an episode of illness. Such a CPR could be also used to: (a) assess CARE needs, (b) measure CARE services, (c) evaluate CARE outcomes, and (d) calculate CARE costs for the Home Health Industry (Saba, 1997).

A federal contract or cooperative agreement could be initiated with the Georgetown HHCC research team to conduct the proposed is possible. It CPR could focus on CARE protocols for the identified top ten medical diagnostic conditions of home health Medicare patients. The contract could be designed to compare the three strategies: (a) the traditional method of reimbursement (HCFA Form 486, (b) the OASIS quality indicators, and (c) the proposed patient CARE --DURING and BETWEEN -- home health visits using the two HHCC terminologies with the 20 CCs. Such a scope of work could be accomplished within a two year time frame.

6. ARE THERE ISSUES RELATED TO THE COMPARABILITY OF THE PMRI?

A. If so, what should the role of the government?

YES I anticipate that issues will emerge regarding the reimbursement of Primary Care Providers including non-physician providers -- Nurse Practitioners, Physician Assistants and other Advanced Practice Nurse Clinicians in all types of health care settings; and more specifically, in the wide range on community health settings such as ambulatory care settings, health maintenance organizations (HMOs), rural health clinics, etc. Further, what the PCPs should use to code and to be reimbursed not only for their diagnostic procedure, therapeutic regimes, but also for Patient CARE Services they provide.

B Is there a need for increased coordination among terminology developers? If so what type?.

As a developer of the HHCC System, it is critical that the terminology developers consider implementing a uniform data standard framework for all the coded terminologies to be mapped. Such a framework could serve as the umbrella structure used to track the continuity of CARE in and across health care settings, geographic locations, and population groups where medical services are provided.

C. Is there a need to coordinate between terminology developers and message standard developers? What type or form should it take?

YES! There is a need to coordinate between terminology developers and message standard developers. To accomplish such a task the federal government should fund an initiative to develop uniform data standard framework.

D. In the short run (1-4 years) and long run (5-10years)?

YES. I believe in the short run a data standard framework for the mapping all health care terminologies in the field of home health could be addressed. The framework should on the “whole sick patient and/or well client”. At this time, the existing terminologies used focus primarily on the disease conditions of body systems and/or surgical procedures. They do not address the patient CARE process of the whole patient/client during an episode of illness.

In the short and long term, the home health setting could be the primary setting that could be use to research patient CARE. The two HHCC terminologies with the 20 CCs could be used to test several areas: (a) test the CPR strategy for measuring patient CARE services -- DURING and BETWEEN -- home health visits; (b) test home health CARE protocols for an episode of illness; (c) test the uniform data standard framework for home health CARE; and (d) measure, costs, quality, and outcomes of patient CARE for an episode of home health illness.

REFERENCES

Chute, C.G., Cohn, S.P., Campbell, K.E., Oliver, D.E., & Campbell, J.R., (1996). The content coverage of clinical classifications. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 3 (3), 224-233.

Dick, R.S., & Steen, E.B. (Eds.). (1991). The Computer-based patient record: An essential technology for health care. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine-National Academy Press.

Henry, S.H., Warren, J.J., Lange, L., & Button, P. (1998, Jul/Aug). A review of major nursing vocabularies and the extent to which they have the characteristics required for implementation in computer-based systems. JAMIA, 5(4), 321-328.

Mortensen, R.A. & Nielsen, G.H. (1996). International Classification of Nursing Practice (Version 0.2) Geneva, Switzerland: International Council of Nursing.

Mortensen, R.A., Mantas, J., Manuela, M., Sermeus, W., Nielsen, G.H., & McAvinue. (1994). Telematics for health care in the European Union. In S.J. Grobe, & E.S.P. Pluyter- Wenting (Eds.). Nursing Informatics: An international overveiew for nursing in a techological era (pp. 750-752). Amsterdam: Elsevier

National Association for Home Care. (1998). Basic statistics about home care. Washington, DC: NAHC.

Cinahl Information Systems (1998). CINAHL Subject Heading List. Glendale, CA: Author.

National Library of Medicine. (199, January). Unified Medical Language System: UMLS knowledge sources 10th Edition. Rockville, MD: NLM

North American Nursing Diagnoses Association, (1991). Taxonomy I: Revised - 1991. St Louis, MO: NANDA.

Nursing Information & Data Set Evaluation Center. (1997). NIDSEC: Standards and scoring guidelines. Washington, DC: American Nurses Association

Saba, V.K. (1995). A new paradigm for computer-based nursing information systems: Twenty care components. In R.A. Greenes, H.E. Peterson, & D.J. Proti (Eds.). MEDINFO’95 Proceedings (pp. 1404-1406). Edmonton, Canada: IMIA

Saba. V.K. (1994, July). Home Health Care Classification (HHCC) of Nursing Diagnoses and Interventions. Washington, DC: Author

Saba, V.K. (1997). Why the Home Health Care Classification is a recognized nomenclature. (1997, March/April). Computers in Nursing, 15(20), S67-S73.

Saba, V.K., & McCormick, A. (1996). Essentials of computers for nursee 2nd Edition. New York City, NY: McGraw Hill.

Saba, V.K., & Sparks, S.M. (1998). Twenty care comonents: An educational strategy to teach nursing science. In PP().

Shaughnessy, P.W., Crisler, K.S.. & Schienker, R.R. (1997). Medicare’s OASIS: Standardization outcome and assessment information set for home health care — OASIS b, March 1997. Denver, CO: Center for Health Services and Policy Research.

World Health Organization. (199). ICD-10: International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health problems: Tenth Revision: Volume 1. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Campbell, J.R., & Payne, T.H. (1994). A comparison of four schemes for codification of problem lists. In J. Ozbolt (Ed.). Symposium for Computer Applications in Medical Care (201- 205). Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus.

Hardiker, N.R., & Rector, A.L. (1998, Jan/Feb). Modeling nursing terminology using the GRAIL representation langauge. JAMIA, 5(1), 120-130.

Henry, S.B., Holzemer, W.L., Randell, C., Hsieh, S-F, & Miller, T.J. (1997). Comparison of nursing interventions classification and Current Procedural Terminology codes for categorizing nursing activities. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 29, 238-251.

Henry, S.H., Holzemer, W.L., Reilly, C.A., & Campbell, J.R. (1994). Terms used by nurses to describe patient problems: Can SNOMED III represent nursing concepts in the patient record: JAMIA 1, 61-74.

Henry, S.H., & Mead, C.N. (1997, May/June). Nursing classifications systems; Necessary but not sufficient for representing “What Nurses Do” for inclusion in computer-based patient record systems. JAMIA 4(3), 222-232.

Holzemer, W.L., Henry, S.B., Dawson, C., Sousa, K., Bain, C., & Hsieh, S-F. (1997). An evaluation of the utility of the Home Health Care Classification for categorizing patient problems and nursing interventions from the hospital setting. In. U.Gerdin, M. Tallberg, P. Wainwright (Eds.). NI’99: Nursing Informatics: The impact of nursing knowledge on health care informatics (pp. 21-26). Stockholm, Sweden: IOS Press.

Lange, L. (1996). Representation of everyday clinical nursing language in UMLS and SNOMED. In J.J. Cimino (ed.). 1996 AMIA Annual Fall Symposium (140-144). Washington DC: Hanley & Belfus.

McCormick, K.A., & Jones, C.B. (1998). Is one taxonomy needed for health care vocabularies and classifications? Online Journal of Issues in Nursing. Available http://www.nusing world.org/ojin/tpc7\-2.html.

McCormick, K.A., Lang, N., Zielstorff, R., Milholland, D.K., Saba, V.K., Jacox, A. (1994, Nov/Dec). Toward standard classification schemes for nursing languages: Recommendations of the American Nurses Association Steering Committee on Databases to Support Clinical Nursing Practice. JAMIA, 1(6), 421-427.

Nielsen, G.H. & Mortensen, R.A. (1996). The architecture for an International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICN)), International Nursing Review 43, 175-182.

Ozbolt, J. Fruchtnicht, J.N., Hayden, J.R. (1994). Toward data standards for clinical nursing information. JAMIA 1, 175-185.

Parlocha P.K. (1995) Defining a Critical Path for Psychiatric Home Care Patients with a diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder (Doctoral Dissertation). San Francisco, CA: University of California. San Francisco,..

Parlocha, P.K., & Henry, S.B. (1998). The usefulness of the Georgetown Home health Care Classification system for coding patient problems and nursing interventions in Psychiatric home care. Computers in Nursing, 16(1), 45-52.

Saba, V.K. twenty nursing diagnoses home health care components (1994). In R.M. Carroll-Johnson & M. Paquette (eds.). Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the Tenth Conference (pp. 301). Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.

Zielstorff, R.D., Cimino, C., Barnett, G.O., Hassan, L., & Blewett, D.R. (1993). The repesentation of nursing terminology in the UMLS meta-thesaurus: A pilot study. In M.E. Frisse (ed.). Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care (392-296). New York: McGraw- Hill.

Zielstorff, R.D., Lang, N.M., Saba, V.K., McCormick, K.A., & Milholland, D.K. (1995). Toward a uniform language for nursing in the US: Work of the American Nurses Association Steering Committee on Databases to Support Clinical Nursing Practice. In R.A. Greenes, H.E. Peterson, & Protti, D. J. (Eds.). MEDINFO ?95 Proceedings (1362-1366). Edmonton, Canada: Healthcare Computing & Communications Canada, Inc.

Zielstorff, R.D., Tronni, C., Basque, J., Griffin, L.R., Welebob, E.M. (1998). Mapping nursing diagnosis nomenclatures for coordinated care. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 30(4), 369-373


APPENDIX A

A complete description of the HHCC of Nursing Diagnoses and Nursing Interventions with the 20 Care Components including their definitions are available on the Internet

Internet Address:

http://www.dml.georgetown.edu/research/hhcc

HOME HEALTH CARE CLASSIFICATION (HHCC) SYSTEM

TWO TERMINOLOGIES:
HHCC OF NURSING DIAGNOSES
and
HHCC OF NURSING INTERVENTIONS
with
20 CARE COMPONENTS

Under Revision
By

Virginia K. Saba, EdD, RN, FAAN, FACMI

Distinguished Scholar
Georgetown University
Washington, DC
May, 1999

HOME HEALTH CARE CLASSIFICATION (HHCC)
of
CARE COMPONENTS
&
CODES


Table 1. Home Health Care Classification - 20 Nursing Components: Alphabetic Index and Codes


A ACTIVITY COMPONENT

B BOWEL ELIMINATION COMPONENT

C CARDIAC COMPONENT

D COGNITIVE COMPONENT

E COPING COMPONENT

F FLUID VOLUME COMPONENT

G HEALTH BEHAVIOR COMPONENT

H MEDICATION COMPONENT

I METABOLIC COMPONENT

J NUTRITIONAL COMPONENT

K PHYSICAL REGULATION COMPONENT

L RESPIRATORY COMPONENT

M ROLE RELATIONSHIP COMPONENT

N SAFETY COMPONENT

O SELF-CARE COMPONENT

P SELF-CONCEPT COMPONENT

Q SENSORY COMPONENT

R SKIN INTEGRITY COMPONENT

S TISSUE PERFUSION COMPONENT

T URINARY ELIMINATION COMPONENT


HOME HEALTH CARE CLASSIFICATION (HHCC):
OF
NURSING DIAGNOSES
with
EXPECTED / ACTUAL OUTCOMES
and
CODING STRUCTURE

Coding structure for Home Health Care Classification (HHCC) of Nursing Diagnoses and Expected Outcomes/Goals. The coding structure consists of five alphanumeric characters.


CODING STRUCTURE

1=Improved, 2=Stabilized, 3=Deteriorated


Table 2: Home Health Care Classification of Nursing Diagnoses and Coding Scheme: 50 Major Categories and 95 Subcategories.


A - ACTIVITY COMPONENT

01 Activity Alteration

01.1 Activity Intolerance

01.2 Activity Intolerance Risk

01.3 Diversional Activity Deficit

01.4 Fatigue

01.5 Physical Mobility Impairment

01.6 Sleep Pattern Disturbance

02 Musculoskeletal Alteration

B - BOWEL ELIMINATION COMPONENT

03 Bowel Elimination Alteration

03.1 Bowel Incontinence

03.2 Colonic Constipation

03.3 Diarrhea

03.4 Fecal Impaction

03.5 Perceived Constipation

03.6 Unspecified Constipation

04 Gastrointestinal Alteration

C - CARDIAC COMPONENT

05 Cardiac Output Alteration

06 Cardiovascular Alteration

06.1 Blood Pressure Alteration

D - COGNITIVE COMPONENT

07 Cerebral Alteration

08 Knowledge Deficit

08.1 Knowledge Deficit of Diagnostic Test

08.2 Knowledge Deficit of Dietary Regimen

08.3 Knowledge Deficit of Disease Process

08.4 Knowledge Deficit of Fluid Volume

08.5 Knowledge Deficit of Medication Regimen

08.6 Knowledge Deficit of Safety Precautions

08.7 Knowledge Deficit of Therapeutic Regimen

09 Thought Processes Alteration

E - COPING COMPONENT

10 Dying Process

11 Family Coping Impairment

11.1 Compromised Family Coping

11.2 Disabled Family Coping

12 Individual Coping Impairment

12.1 Adjustment Impairment

12.2 Decisional Conflict

12.3 Defensive Coping

12.4 Denial

13 Post-Trauma Response

13.1 Rape Trauma Syndrome

14 Spiritual State Alteration

14.1 Spiritual Distress

F - FLUID VOLUME COMPONENT

15 Fluid Volume Alteration

15.1 Fluid Volume Deficit

15.2 Fluid Volume Deficit Risk

15.3 Fluid Volume Excess

15.4 Fluid Volume Excess Risk

G - HEALTH BEHAVIOR COMPONENT

16 Growth and Development Alteration

17 Health Maintenance Alteration

18 Health Seeking Behavior Alteration

19 Home Maintenance Alteration

20 Noncompliance

20.1 Noncompliance of Diagnostic Test

20.2 Noncompliance of Dietary Regimen

20.3 Noncompliance of Fluid Volume

20.4 Noncompliance of Medication Regimen

20.5 Noncompliance of Safety Precautions

20.6 Noncompliance of Therapeutic Regimen

H - MEDICATION COMPONENT

21 Medication Risk

21.1 Polypharmacy

I - METABOLIC COMPONENT

22 Endocrine Alteration

23 Immunologic Alteration

23.1 Protection Alteration

J - NUTRITIONAL COMPONENT

24 Nutrition Alteration

24.1 Body Nutrition Deficit

24.2 Body Nutrition Deficit Risk

24.3 Body Nutrition Excess

24.4 Body Nutrition Excess Risk

K - PHYSICAL REGULATION COMPONENT

25 Physical Regulation Alteration

25.1 Dysreflexia

25.2 Hyperthermia

25.3 Hypothermia

25.4 Thermoregulation Impairment

25.5 Infection Risk

25.6 Infection Unspecified

L - RESPIRATORY COMPONENT

26 Respiration Alteration

26.1 Airway Clearance Impairment

26.2 Breathing Pattern Impairment

26.3 Gas Exchange Impairment

M - ROLE RELATIONSHIP COMPONENT

27 Role Performance Alteration

27.1 Parental Role Conflict

27.2 Parenting Alteration

27.3 Sexual Dysfunction

28 Communication Impairment

28.1 Verbal Impairment

29 Family Processes Alteration

30 Grieving

30.1 Anticipatory Grieving

30.2 Dysfunctional Grieving

31 Sexuality Patterns Alteration

32 Socialization Alteration

32.1 Social Interaction Alteration

32.2 Social Isolation

N - SAFETY COMPONENT

33 Injury Risk

33.1 Aspiration Risk

33.2 Disuse Syndrome

33.3 Poisoning Risk

33.4 Suffocation Risk

33.5 Trauma Risk

34 Violence Risk

O - SELF-CARE COMPONENT

35 Bathing/Hygiene Deficit

36 Dressing/Grooming Deficit

37 Feeding Deficit

37.1 Breastfeeding Impairment

37.2 Swallowing Impairment

38 Self Care Deficit

38.1 Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) Alteration

38.2 Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs)Alteration

39 Toileting Deficit

P - SELF-CONCEPT COMPONENT

40 Anxiety

41 Fear

42 Meaningfulness Alteration

42.1 Hopelessness

42.2 Powerlessness

43 Self Concept Alteration

43.1 Body Image Disturbance

43.2 Personal Identity Disturbance

43.3 Chronic Low Self-Esteem Disturbance

43.4 Situational Self-Esteem Disturbance

Q - SENSORY COMPONENT

44 Sensory Perceptual Alteration

44.1 Auditory Alteration

44.2 Gustatory Alteration

44.3 Kinesthetic Alteration

44.4 Olfactory Alteration

44.5 Tactile Alteration

44.6 Unilateral Neglect

44.7 Visual Alteration

45 Comfort Alteration

45.1 Acute Pain

45.2 Chronic Pain

45.3 Unspecified Pain

R - SKIN INTEGRITY COMPONENT

46 Skin Integrity Alteration

46.1 Oral Mucous Membranes Impairment

46.2 Skin Integrity Impairment

46.3 Skin Integrity Impairment Risk

46.4 Skin Incision

47 Peripheral Alteration

S - TISSUE PERFUSION COMPONENT

48 Tissue Perfusion Alteration

T - URINARY ELIMINATION COMPONENT

49 Urinary Elimination Alteration

49.1 Functional Urinary Incontinence

49.2 Reflex Urinary Incontinence

49.3 Stress Urinary Incontinence

49.4 Total Urinary Incontinence

49.5 Urge Urinary Incontinence

49.6 Urinary Retention

50 Renal Alteration


1 Adapted from NANDA: Taxonomy I: Revised 1990.

HOME HEALTH CARE CLASSIFICATION (HHCC):
OF
NURSING INTERVENTIONS
with
TYPE INTERVENTION ACTION
and
CODING STRUCTURE

Coding structure for the Home Health Care Classification of Nursing Interventions and Type Intervention Action. The coding structure consists of five alphanumeric characters.


CODING STRUCTURE

1=Assess, 2=Care, 3=Teach, 4=Manage


Table 3: Home Health Care Classification of Nursing Interventions and Coding Scheme: 60 Major Categories & 100 Subcategories.


A - ACTIVITY COMPONENT

01 Activity Care

01.1 Cardiac Rehabilitation

01.2 Energy Conservation

02 Fracture Care

02.1 Cast Care

02.2 Immobilizer Care

03 Mobility Therapy

03.1 Ambulation Therapy

03.2 Assistive Device Therapy

03.3 Transfer Care

04 Sleep Pattern Control

05 Rehabilitation Care

05.1 Range of Motion

05.2 Rehabilitation Exercise

B - BOWEL ELIMINATION COMPONENT

06 Bowel Care

06.1 Bowel Training

06.2 Disimpaction

06.3 Enema

07 Ostomy Care

07.1 Ostomy Irrigation

C - CARDIAC COMPONENT

08 Cardiac Care

09 Pacemaker Care

D -COGNITIVE COMPONENT

10 Behavior Care

11 Reality Orientation

E - COPING COMPONENT

12 Counseling Service

12.1 Coping Support

12.2 Stress Control

13 Emotional Support

13.1 Spiritual Comfort

14 Terminal Care

14.1 Bereavement Support

14.2 Dying/Death Measures

14.3 Funeral Arrangements

F - FLUID VOLUME COMPONENT

15 Fluid Therapy

15.1 Hydration Status

15.2 Intake/Output

16 Infusion Care

16.1 Intravenous Care

16.2 Venous Catheter Care

G - HEALTH BEHAVIOR COMPONENT

17 Community Special Programs

17.1 Adult Day Center

17.2 Hospice

17.3 Meals-on-Wheels

17.4 Other Community Special Program

18 Compliance Care

18.1 Compliance with Diet

18.2 Compliance with Fluid Volume

18.3 Compliance with Medical Regime

18.4 Compliance with Medication Regime

18.5 Compliance with Safety Precautions

18.6 Compliance with Therapeutic Regime

19 Nursing Contact

19.1 Bill of Rights

19.2 Nursing Care Coordination

19.3 Nursing Status Report

20 Physician Contact

20.1 Medical Regime Orders

20.2 Physician Status Report

21 Professional/Ancillary Services

21.1 Home Health Aide Service

21.2 Medical Social Worker Service

21.3 Nurse Specialist Service

21.4 Occupational Therapist Service

21.5 Physical Therapist Service

21.6 Speech Therapist Service

21.7 Other Ancillary Service

21.8 Other Professional Service

H - MEDICATION COMPONENT

22 Chemotherapy Care

23 Injection Administration

23.1 Insulin Injection

23.2 Vitamin B12 Injection

24 Medication Administration

24.1 Medication Actions

24.2 Medication Prefill Preparation

24.3 Medication Side Effects

25 Radiation Therapy Care

I - METABOLIC COMPONENT

26 Allergic Reaction Care

27 Diabetic Care

J - NUTRITIONAL COMPONENT

28 Gastrostomy/Nasogastric Tube Care

28.1 Gastrostomy/Nasogastric Tube Insertion

28.2 Gastrostomy/Nasogastric Tube Irrigation

29 Nutrition Care

29.1 Enteral/Parenteral Feeding

29.2 Feeding Technique

29.3 Regular Diet

29.4 Special Diet

K - PHYSICAL REGULATION COMPONENT

30 Infection Control

30.1 Universal Precautions

31 Physical Health Care

31.1 Health History

31.2 Health Promotion

31.3 Physical Examination

31.4 Physical Measurements

32 Specimen Analysis

32.1 Blood Specimen Analysis

32.2 Stool Specimen Analysis

32.3 Urine Specimen Analysis

32.4 Other Specimen Analysis

33 Vital Signs

33.1 Blood Pressure

33.2 Temperature

33.3 Pulse

33.4 Respiration

34 Weight Control

L - RESPIRATORY COMPONENT

35 Oxygen Therapy Care

36 Respiratory Care

36.1 Breathing Exercises

36.2 Chest Physiotherapy

36.3 Inhalation Therapy

36.4 Ventilator Care

37 Tracheostomy Care

M - ROLE RELATIONSHIP COMPONENT

38 Communication Care

39 Psychosocial Analysis

39.1 Home Situation Analysis

39.2 Interpersonal Dynamics Analysis

N - SAFETY COMPONENT

40 Abuse Control

41 Emergency Care

42 Safety Precautions

42.1 Environmental Safety

42.2 Equipment Safety

42.3 Individual Safety

O - SELF-CARE COMPONENT

43 Personal Care

43.1 Activities of Daily Living (ADLs)

43.2 Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs)

44 Bedbound Care

44.1 Positioning Therapy

P - SELF-CONCEPT COMPONENT

45 Mental Health Care

45.1 Mental Health History

45.2 Mental Health Promotion

45.3 Mental Health Screening

45.4 Mental Health Treatment

46 Violence Control

Q - SENSORY COMPONENT

47 Pain Control

48 Comfort Care

49 Ear Care

49.1 Hearing Aid Care

49.2 Wax Removal

50 Eye Care

50.1 Cataract Care

R - SKIN INTEGRITY COMPONENT

51 Decubitus Care

51.1 Decubitus Stage 1

51.2 Decubitus Stage 2

51.3 Decubitus Stage 3

51.4 Decubitus Stage 4

52 Edema Control

53 Mouth Care

53.1 Denture Care

54 Skin Care

54.1 Skin Breakdown Control

55 Wound Care

55.1 Drainage Tube Care

55.2 Dressing Change

55.3 Incision Care

S - TISSUE PERFUSION COMPONENT

56 Foot Care

57 Perineal Care

T - URINARY ELIMINATION COMPONENT

58 Bladder Care

58.1 Bladder Instillation

58.2 Bladder Training

59 Dialysis Care

60 Urinary Catheter Care

60.1 Urinary Catheter Insertion

60.2 Urinary Catheter Irrigation